Two Books that have Found Me

Occasionally books turn up that are a message I need to hear. In some cases they may have been books written years ago, long ago read and benefited from by friends and even recommended to me. I may have bought it and had it sitting on a shelf or in a pile by the side of my bed for years, probably because it was a good idea but I was not yet ready for the message.

At other times I just see a book, or hear of it somehow, and just know I must get it now, and drop everything else to read it. They are often life-changing. It was like that with ‘The Shack’, and Richard Rohr’s ‘The Enneagram’ and Brennan Manning’s ‘Ragamuffin Gospel’. You’ve probably got your own list. Some people read in the hope of solving problems in their world, I mostly read to solve problems in myself – in the hope that if I can make progress the world around me will enjoy it and respond. I think both orientations are valid.

I’m not a prolific reader. Each book feels like quite an investment of time and mental energy so I have to choose carefully. Maybe what I subconsciously do is let the books find me. That’s just preamble however. What I mean to say is I’ve had one book of each type find me this last month.

The first was Tom Wright’s ‘Surprised by Hope’, which has been on my shelf for a couple of years. The second is ‘Immortal Diamond’ by Richard Rohr, which leapt off Blackwell’s shelf. They both approach the subject (for me revelatory at present) of resurrection, but from different directions. Tom’s from rigorous scriptural argument and Richard’s from a contemplative and mystical angle. Two books, for me, in harmony; witnessing the same thing.

From Tom’s point of view, resurrection has been a lost truth who’s absence from our consciousness has led to diminished thinking and living on the part of Christians. The book actually did for me what it said on the cover, it restored hope in a surprising way.

The little piece of revelation that broke through to me this morning was that because of the hope of resurrection, it is O.K. for things to be begun in this age that will not be finished by us, or even by anyone. It is O.K. to be unrewarded and unknown in this age. And I don’t mean sadly and self-sacrificially accepted, but really, joyfully, O.K. I can be confident that all I endeavour by faith in Christ will finally be completed, fulfilled and perfected in the really real resurrection age. Nothing that was by faith that dies and goes into the ground will remain there forever. Nothing is lost, nothing is wasted. I no longer need to define success in any terms I’ve learned so far.

There are also promises and dreams I’ve lived with and not yet seen. At times I’ve imagined they were expiring, but now not so. Time is not what I thought it was, neither is a lifetime. Weariness and discouragement can fall away in the light of such truths.

On the cliff at Dodman Point in Cornwall there stands a large stone cross first erected in 1896, with a plaque laid at its base. At first sight one thinks, ‘War Memorial’, but in fact it’s a ‘navigational aid’. The plaque says something like this…”In the sure hope of the soon coming of our Lord Jesus Christ and the resurrection from the dead, and for the encouragement of those who live by faith…this cross is erected.” The first time I saw this cross there was a sense of past and future opening up and being reconciled in the present, at a geographical point, and me standing there. I think the truth that Tom reminds us of does the same.

So the second angle, one that I find contemplatives such as Richard help me with, and which makes increasing sense to me combined with the first perspective begins with a question:

How much participation in the resurrection age is available to me to experience now, and how, really, experientially might it be accessed? Though for the moment it is always held in paradoxical tension with incompleteness, it surely has to be experiential and not just knowledge.

In the resurrected, restored, heaven-and-earth-reunited age there is an essential element of me that will be there, recognisable but different. We can only try to imagine, but like Jesus as the gardener or the fellow traveller on the road to Emmaus, who ‘I’ will be then is the ‘me’ who I am now, only more so; minus the temporary hiddenness and restrictedness. Mystics and contemplatives have told us there is a ‘True Self’ discoverable amidst the temporary clutter of fallen-ness and conditioning, and found that the quest to perceive and honour the immortal diamond; the Divine Image we are created in, involved dying. This process they wisely called ‘life’, and the art was waking up from the trance and paying attention to ‘life’.

On waking up they discovered there was a choice needed to invest our identity in that which continues, which is eternal, and disinvest our identity from that which must fall away. Not disinvesting from the physical body (that problem will be solved by a simple upgrade at some point), but the constructed, conditioned, inadequate ego identity that is the ‘me’ that cannot survive the glory that is my destiny. It is the part that dies continually by being let go of, and the part that as it dies, really feels like death. In Christian teaching I think this is what we call ‘Living by the Spirit’, only that has been seldom earthed.

The mystics and contemplatives (of which Paul must have been one) just had more courage than most to explore the experience to the limits to find out what was there. To let go means falling, to fall means entering the abyss, in the abyss is the dragon, but dragons hoard stolen treasure. By the time we encounter the dragon, however, we have already ‘died’ so it has no power over us. So we plunder, reclaim our lost treasure and more besides and we return with gifts. Is this what ‘I have been crucified with Christ and I no longer live’ means?

They encourage us to believe that we can co-operate with the letting go now and as we do so experience more of who we will be, which is not a stranger to us, but is who we really are. They tell us the falling is actually how we get caught and held – the way we’ve longed for all our lives.

Richard encourages me and reveals the meaning of all my experiences in the light of resurrection starting and still to come.

Taking the two together; the sharp perceptions of the intellectual thinkers and the courage and sensitivity of the mystics seem to me to be pointing the same way. The great fulfilment of which resurrection is part is getting nearer and clearer, and it is more worth living fully than ever before.

Not so simple

Some 16 years ago I wrote a paper on the issue of the biblical material and homosexuality. In it I tried to look honestly at the biblical material. Having previously written on gender equality and Scripture, so for example, ‘I forbid a woman to teach and have authority over a man’ I maintained had no relevance to the issue, I was asked why the same did not apply to the issue of homosexuality. My response was that there was a key issue of what can be termed the ‘intra-canonical dialogue’. Let me explain.

With slavery there were many pro-slavery evangelicals who appealed to the authority of Scripture, but, amidst a slavery culture, there were some/enough Scriptures that clearly pointed in a different direction. And in the case of women within a patriarchal society (and a patriarchal-biased book) there was a phenomenal pull in an egalitarian direction. But in the case of homosexuality that there was not this intra-canonical dialogue.

Another aspect that needs a lot of unpacking (and qualification) was that the boundary for sexual activity was marriage and that marriage was between a woman and a man.

At the same time I wrote that original paper I was asked what would convince me to take a view that differed from the perspective that I was outlining. My response was that if there was a community that embraced same-sex activity, yet espoused biblical beliefs and gave clear evidence that the fruit of the Spirit was being manifested among them, then I might have to reconsider. That fruit would need to be clearly manifested (and not just through some claim to manifest ‘love’) and it would need to be maintained over a period of time – then we might have to consider that the Holy Spirit had ‘cleansed their hearts through faith’. (Now in applying this test I realise that if we were to apply it to some heterosexual Christian communities they might fail the test.)

In my response I was thinking of the first-century response to the Gentiles. The apostolic community was immersed in the biblical narrative but their primary question was ‘what do we perceive the Holy Spirit is doing’ which then pushed them to interpret and re-interpret the Scriptures.

Over the years I have had some wonderful dialogue with people of same-sex orientation. Men with a sensitivity and awareness of who they are – and an empathy with others – that is so often lacking in many hetero-sexual males. Without a doubt Jesus-like qualities.

I have also been very challenged when reading the Gospels. I am sure that Jesus would not be popular in church-circles because he would hang out with the ‘wrong’ people… and that would include the gay community.

Is there healing for our sexuality? Sure but what do we mean by that. My identity is who I am, part of my identity is my sexuality, and part of my sexuality is my orientation amongst other elements. First and foremost I am not defined according to my orientation. We do not introduce ourselves as ‘Hi I am xxx, I am hetero-/homo-sexually oriented.’ Our identity is in who we are, our personhood. Part of our healing is to realise that our sexuality does not define us.

There is nothing intrinsically more holy about being hetero-sexual in orientation than being homo-sexually oriented. Orientation – and I think most believers are clear on this – is not an issue. What remains is how I express my sexuality.

Having recently read, and reviewed, God’s Gay Agenda, I would gladly say to anyone ‘read this book with an open mind’. I have no doubt that the author and the community she represents are committed to Scripture and that there is no objective reason to say the Holy Spirit is not present with them. Indeed, and I thought rather ironically at that, when the author was at a low point in her spiritual life she went to Pensacola and was powerfully impacted there. She recounts how the Spirit came on her and in a corporate prayer time she began to groan and call out for the freedom for her people (the gay community), that the barriers to their entrance to the community of God would be broken down, that they would find their place.

We have to listen to such testimonies. If we disregard them we should also disregard other testimonies that have their source in a similar experience or environment. What is for sure is that this situation is not about to disappear and in a society / church where there is a greater push for transparency we are going to find ourselves being shocked at numerous points. Thank God for Scripture, but we so need the Holy Spirit to help us in our interpretation.

Here then in this post I want to conclude with some questions.

  • Slavery – women – homosexuality. Are these on a trajectory or is there a difference?
  • Prophetic imagery? I can see the dualities of Scripture (heaven/earth) being represented in the duality of male/female coming together. Can gay-marriage be prophetic in a biblical sense or simply provocative to force us to reconsider our boundaries?
  • Are the restrictions on same-sex activity cultic and anti-idolatrous in their contexts or are they wider than this?
  • What are legitimate boundaries for sexual expression?
  • And where does the call to celibacy fit in? (And with reference to Sandra’s book is the biblical reference to those who ‘are eunuchs from the womb’ a reference to celibacy or to those with same-sex orientation?)

Someone wrote me and asked if my views had changed since reading Sandra’a book. That is hard to answer. My attitudes I am sure have. By that I mean, we all think we are open and do not have a problem, but on many issues we can find that a button is pushed. So I am being softened, this has been an ongoing process over the past 25+ years. (Before that I knew too much to be softened… (translation – was too defensive)). I am sure that in this context Sandra’s book has been another tool from heaven in softening me.

My views today? I still have questions. I have what might be called ‘sticking points’, but I am desperately trying to hear what the Holy Spirit is doing and saying.

The dialogue is certainly with us.

For those interested here is Sandra’s web site.

Empires… how long do they last?

The academic world has really taken hold of this issue of Empire. Scot McKnight and Joe Modica have a recent recently published book called Jesus is Lord, Caesar is Not: Evaluating Empire in New Testament Studies. There have been studies on Empire for a considerable length of time – the Anabaptists with people like Yoder of course have understood this issue – but unless I am mistaken the focus on this issue within Academia has intensified in recent years. Helped along by the re-discovery of the Gospel as political proclamation, the new perspective etc.

In around 2002 I can remember how in prayer we began to increasingly touch on the issues of Imperial power, and if I had received a euro for every time I have (mis-)quoted that the

Imperial spirit is that which pervades any organisation so that there are a few that shape the organisation and they promise benefits to all who comply but the real benefits flow back to the few.

I would be reasonably well off (well in euro terms!!).

I remember the day when I had a word that God was going to lead us to the Roman cities in the UK to undo a prevailing spirit there that was still active in the land. Two or three days later I met with a few people, we had no discussion about this and into the mix Sharon Stone said she had had a dream and in it the Lord said ‘I am coming to roll up the Roman road’.

Exciting days. Has the prayer and revelation increased the interest in the academic world?

Prayer… right thinking… legs and feet to the body.

Flooding in Rome at the Milvian Bridge. Is it too crazy to think we could be seeing a shift on Imperial issues on a larger scale than we thought possible? I am under no illusion that we build the kingdom (basileia = Greek for kingdom and the Greek word used for Empire) but I do think increasingly there are gaps appearing where truth and good practice can rise. And those who speak the truth and get in with good practice might include a few Christians but will certainly include many who have not found themselves in a personal relationship with Jesus, but they might just be influenced by his Spirit.

Posting soon

We are back and as always much to digest. I will be posting on our time away soon – not too many reflections as the work there can certainly not be accused of self-promotion so I do not want to embarrass them, though it is probably the best work that we have been able to see. Not perfect but…

Also in the next few days I will be posting here on a book I have been reading: God’s Gay Agenda. Some time back I agreed to review some books tied to thespeakeasy.info, so I need to fulfil that obligation.

Recently questions over austerity have arisen!! The 28 year old graduate who seems to have found errors in one of the main research papers undergirding the drive for austerity as the cure, and now The President of the European Commission, Jose Manuel Barroso, has said: “While I think ‘austerity’ is fundamentally right, I think it has reached its limit.”

Interesting times!!

Also very challenging while in Romania we discovered that under the communist regime the (now debt-laden country) had a significant surplus and was free of debt. So all we need now is some smart volunteers to help steer society in a nice straight line. Any volunteers out there?

Pause for breath

We are travelling this week so will only be online on a few occasions… this being one of them. We made our (customary) 15 hour journey on Monday and arrived in Romania and our bed (3.00am) to be reminded as to why we come here these next two following days. I hope to put a little more flesh on the bones at some point but this is one of the best mission-wholistic-gospel-faithful projects that we connect with. At one level I would love to list out some of the amazing stories that are here, but am also aware that Lee and team are not looking to blow their trumpet.

I have just finished a day on Revelation – started at 9.00am so if the team is not a little tired I can make up for that. A pleasure to input and so receptive. It certainly leaves us with the huge thought of what does this look like with feet on it. While here I have been very provoked to think through the answer to the question I present below and then the practical issue of who.

There is enough theology framework around now regarding the nature of the Gospel, resurrection as political act, New Jerusalem, critique of Empire, kenarchy etc., that we need to begin to find an answer relating to the apostolic criteria:

  • Apostolic mandate knows about the issue of territory
  • It relates to a generational time frame
  • It is obedient to the one eternal Gospel but seeds it in a culturally relevant way
  • and can fill the blank in of ‘My God is able…’

I will be pursuing these issues these next days in my thinking.

The Questions or the Answers?

“Stay with the question. When there is a question, you are awake. When there is an answer you go to sleep.”

It was a comment made by the teacher on an Enneagram weekend I went on recently, and I have been pondering the wisdom of it a lot. It challenged me to ask which, then, is more valuable – the question or the answer?

His point was about letting questions remain to accomplish what they need to; not hating the not knowing, the transition, the imbalance so much that we have to dismiss it by the fastest means.

Our lives seldom present us with a set of instant answers, they more often immerse us in questions that set us on searches and journeys. They place us uncomfortably within questions not yet answered, with paradoxes that, unless we are to do violence to ourselves or others, just have to be held and with mysteries that we are not yet equipped to probe.  And yet we are also made to believe in fulfilments and home-comings and to yearn towards them. In Acts 17 Paul seems to be saying to the Athenians that the very environment we live in, God deliberately tailored for us to stir questions and initiate searchings rather than to present solutions. Jesus too, seems to have more often than not replied to questions with questions. Something was more important to him than knowing the answer.

It is what being alive is all about in our present age I think. Not so much about the arriving as the being on the way. The quick answer, the sure thing that we can settle on before we know why, could be more of a curse than a blessing. It could park us in a siding and delude us. Eschatologically as well, our lives are in tension between something begun; something promised but not yet completed. Who you and I really are is still a mystery, yet to be revealed. There is resurrection potential within; a concealed diamond crusted for the moment in the fallen and temporary but one day to be revealed in unimaginable spiritual and physical glory. There is an image of God we glimpse in ourselves and each other, hinting at something more to come.

So letting each other live with the journey and with the not yet discovered must be as important as embracing it for ourselves. We often feel, with our friends and partners and children that we already have just the thing that they need, so we want to do them a favour by short-cutting their search. Sometimes we mean well, wanting to spare them some effort or pain. At other times it’s because their state has made us feel uncomfortable and we want relieve ourselves of their pain. Perhaps it’s because we long to be useful, or we may even be motivated by fear that they will never arrive, or arrive at the wrong place. I know I’ve done all this to those I care for at times.

So, being true to God’s ways with us and the way he allows life to teach us, is the church meant to give the answers or to facilitate and support the searching?

Preparing some notes

Just putting together some notes for our time this coming week in Romania. So here is a seed thought that I am seeking to incubate between now and then:

  • The New Jerusalem fills the whole of Creation
  • God and the Lamb fill the whole of the New Jerusalem.

This could go in a number of directions. But are we to ‘get into God’ or does ‘God get into us as we get into Creation’?

Still valid

I had an email this morning from someone who said – ‘I was given your book Impacting the City. Given what you are writing on do you still see it as current?’

Yes I do!!! Everything I write is valid for all time… well maybe not!! The book though is still valid, even if I might express things a little differently some 10+ years on.

What has changed is the location of the body. It is not too different to the Exile. In the land the Jews had a way of life that was related to who they were in that context, in Babylon the context had changed totally. They had to learn to pursue the prosperity of an alien land.

So a brief recap:

I see three phases in what God has been doing with us. (All of which has to be saturated with the Presence of God.)

  • The prayer element with a strong aspect of dealing with history. This has been done and is not completed, more will be called for – but this is not the primary emphasis for now
  • Learning issues of cities, communities and their giftings and coresponding strongholds. This is where Impacting the City book comes in. We have much more to learn and implement on this. Probably in a number of places this is where people are at. But it is not the main focus currently.
  • Being re-located through dis-location. This is the Exilic experience where the main emphasis is currently. I believe that the majority of the body of Christ is pre- or in this phase

Exile was a major reflection back. It is when the scriptures come together with post-Exilic editing and post-Exilic writing. There is a shift from simply Abraham as father to Adam as the originator. They cannot simply deal with being the chosen people, but what it means to be set within creation with all its fallenness.

This is the current phase for many in the Western body of Christ. Of course many simply think let’s get back – back to the Reformation, back to the simplicity of the house church setting, back to the third wave, back to… It is important not to abandon any of those (and for me of course Reformation does not equal Reformed but the Anabaptist strand) but the setting is different.

So former writings are valid, but the location has changed. The outworking is now the challenge. Recently the core group of people that we dialogue with when back in the UK asked a question. Are we tentatively coming to a building phase again? I think the nervousness of the term building is necessary too, as all language comes with history, but until there is a better word, it can remain as a tentative question. So the question is there, but the setting has to be different. The books can be valid the application but has to be in the right setting.

Interestingly when we came home from the UK across the street in the ‘please prop me up before I fall down building’ the workmen moved in and have begun to reconstruct it. Interesting.

Reflections

Well a third of the year has gone. Cyprus has yet again emphasised the level of the crisis with no quick-fix solutions being offered. An economy that benefited from allowing people to ‘hide’ their money. Alongside this further exposures are in the pipeline with respect to the Virgin Islands and finances.

Italy is as yet without a government but with a pope who has made quite an impact, one of the most noticeable signs with his washing the feet of a Muslim woman at Easter. We reflect often on a dream that Gayle had that indicated Vatican – Rome – Italy. Chuck Pierce had prophesied about a flood in Rome that would mark a cleansing in the church – and that took place by the Milvian bridge, the place of the famous Constantinian victory in 312. So there has been a change in the Vatican… now a shift in Roman politics?

Spain continues to see a push for corruption to be squeezed into the open with now even a direct member of the royal family being prosecuted in a case.

In Jan. his year I wrote: The political scene in the West will polarise yet further. There will be a push both left and right. As a sign there will be reports of land literally cracking open (headlines such as ‘new fizzure appears’), indicating that lands are dividing politically. Well there have been a number of sink holes and landslides that have appeared at the beginning of this year. They are caused by natural causes or through an acceleration through human abuse.

Always economics and religion are the two elements that are hit the hardest in a time of spiritual turn around.

Values and consistency are being challenged. When economics are separated from culture and societal values we sow seeds of division. If people are fed individualistic values in the economic sphere then it spills over into society. Corporate responsibility is not the same as control. ‘Am I my brother’s keeper?’ is still responded to the same as before.

An interesting point was made this week in Dover Beach that the news channel advocating ‘family values’ does not exactly promote the values it suggests through its entertainment channels. Or in the UK, the same operation sells its ‘news’ with the infamous third page. Inconsistent – or consistent?

We are also a third of the way through this decade of re-alignment and re-balancing. Our map is upside down – makes for an interesting view of the world.

In honour of cultures

I followed the work of Richard Twiss and Wiconi International for a number of years. I never met Richard but felt the sadness at his loss when he died in February this year. Gayle and I watched this video a few days ago. Sadness for the loss of his life and the reminder of the hegemony of the European christendom world. Hope as whatever Richard embodied of the Jesus’ way lives on and as christendom lies in dust in Europe to think of what is rising.

Simple and profound

From John Burke writes at NextReformation on the post-Christian context these observations:

In today’s post-Christian context, people often need the intersection of three elements in order to find faith and become the church.

1. A friendship with someone who truly acts like Jesus — listening, caring, serving and talking openly about faith in a non-pressuring way.
2. Relationship with a ‘tribe’ of four to five other believers whom they enjoy hanging out with and who make them feel they truly belong.
3. A ‘come as you are’ learning experiment where they can learn, usually for six to eighteen months, about the way of Jesus.

Israel Loves Iran Loves Israel

A month or so after Adam and I returned from Iran, it was an immense encouragement to come across the Facebook site Israel Loves Iran. Over the months I have read some of the messages and testimonies and found them very moving. The other day I discovered the reciprocal Iran loves Israel site. Obviously much smaller, but with censored internet inside Iran, it would, I guess, only be expatriate Iranians who have the freedom to participate openly.

As I prepared to travel and pray in Iran in 2011, I sensed the Lord speaking to me about a ‘special relationship’ between Iran and Israel. In many spheres of life where there is un-health or fallen-ness, often what we see manifesting is not just a reduced measure of God’s intended creation mandate, but rather the exact opposite. Seeing this might even be a big clue to knowing what specifics to pray for and seek; not so much a reform of what is, but an embryonic expression of the complete opposite.

In Iran, as we walked the streets we often prayed that the land would be spared from war with Israel/America (and if I’m honest, especially while WE were in the country. We wanted to come home. Self-preservation is so strong).  But seriously, despite the belligerence of Iran’s leaders, any conflict would be so one-sided as to be suicidal. Poor odds are not the issue. The Iranian and Shia psyche accepts the self-sacrificing and suicidal. The annual Shia Ashura festival reflects Iranians finding their identity in their pain and suffering in the same way perhaps that another nation might find its identity in its success, or in it’s fighting spirit. You could say the modern Iranian nation is built on martyrdom. It is a land that land has a repeated history of population massacres, so that may affect an attitude that one may not be able to choose to live, but one can choose to die. And who would such death empower? The one who wants to eliminate his enemy needs to be saved from himself, as does the one who wants to sacrifice himself.

It is an interesting cultural phenomenon that Iranians themselves are not completely comfortable with Islam. Many look back to a pre-Islamic age, and the ruler who presided over their golden age was Cyrus the Great.

“Cyrus the Great Loved You…We Love You” Is the most recent post on Iran Loves Israel. When Iranians perceive that Cyrus loved Israel they are referring to the emancipation that was a feature of Cyrus’ rule. I’m sure he was no saint, but Jews along with many conquered minorities were released from slavery, re-settled and granted freedoms in a way that was extremely uncharacteristic of Imperial Rulers certainly then, and even now.

Biblically, though Cyrus did not know Israel’s God, he responded to his timings and purposes to the extent that he could be called a ‘Servant of God and of God’s purposes for Israel’. It was all to do with a return from exile and a completely new start.

Our enemies define us more than our friends do. What, or who, we hate can to a large extent form the structure of our character, as individuals, and by extension, it must happen to us as nations as well. Pakistan, for example, has no coherent ‘I am’ identity apart from India. It is almost entirely defined by reaction; by being ‘NOT India’. If there was no India to hate and fear – one wonders if Pakistan would exist. At a personal level too, if we have the courage to go there, we often encounter a shadow side, an unacceptable, hated and repressed aspect of ourselves. We can discover, though, that in embracing the shadow, we are acting redemptively for our whole selves and that we recover precious parts of ourselves that had been lost in the hated and feared shadow.

I don’t know…there may yet be war. The choice to befriend by the powerless may not be enough to moderate the egos of the powerful. If there is, I will weep. I care, but not about being wrong because there is something so worth hoping for here. Though I personally believe that in Christ the redemption dynamic has moved beyond the national boundaries of the Old Testament, I am sure that nations as they stand today can still reflect that, and if Israel can ever reflect what God intended her to be, Iran will have a part to play in the discovery.