Explorations in Theology

The series explores a theology that is human friendly! Jesus as the true human shows us who God is, and because of his consideration for us ('who are we, that God should make note of us?') defines who humanity was created to be. The nature of sin is to fall short of the glory of God. The glory of God as revealed in the truly human one - 'we beheld his glory full of grace and truth'. This volume is a foundation for the other volumes. And there are ZOOM groups available...
Volume 2 Significant Other and Volume 3 A Subversive Movement now also available!
El libro electrónico (en Español) también ya está disponible

So go on... you know you want to!!! Order a copy Boz Publications

By all means compromise

I am such a purist. Egaliterian, non-hierarchical, opposing the imperial spirit. I could go on with such an impressive resumé. (You know what I am writing is so true!) Yet when I come to how God works he is not the purist that I am. He has an amazing ability to compromise.

God shows up in the midst of Empire. Even the British Empire and the spread of missions went hand in hand… the Roman Empire with its one world government was useful for communication and the road systems for travel. The Gospel spread around the then known world at an amazing rate. (Bizarrely this was how some used to explain the phrase of Jesus coming at ‘the fullness of time’. Imagine it – God just waiting for the help he needed from those wonderful Caesars!) And the OT example of God not wanting a king (and by the third generation of kings, Solomon ‘the wise’ becomes just a new Pharaoh) yet he anoints the king. He did not want a Temple but his glory showed up… he did not want priests but… All of that just plainly narks me a lot… until I realise he has shown up once or twice with me too so I don’t complain too loudly.

Compromise. To connect we have to meet, and if for example I connect with a Roman catholic priest I do not assume they are wrong in the sense that God has not called them. But I do not kiss my brains good bye and go seek being ordained or changing my beliefs. There is an element where I have to decide what carries integrity for me, what are the lines I cannot personally cross, and at the same time I cannot draw those lines for someone else.

Here are some thoughts on where we compromise (I am not talking morally):

  • We have to keep our personal integrity. We know what our personal lines are.
  • We have to decide what we can do, or if there something we need to do, that is a compromise for the sake of the Gospel. (I was once challenged that I needed to take out my ear ring if I was to ‘minister’ – I simply had one internal question: for the sake of the Gospel do I refuse, or for the sake of the Gospel do I comply. The answer can differ in different situations.)
  • If we make a compromise it needs to be redemptive so that we help move things forward and not leave them there in the place where we connected.
  • If we put some structures in place they need to be as temporary as possible. Sadly it is easier to start something than stop it – hence I see the Sabbath, the 7 year fallow, the 50 year Jubilee being to force a break. Apostolic teams might be helpful at a stage but they quickly default to a set of churches ‘belonging’ to the apostle – Paul was clear that all ministries belong to the body of Christ, not the other way round. The default is to structural domination – as illustrated by the biblical material on ‘the city’ and exemplified by Babylon.
  • Empire is a spirit. Within empires there are good kings and bad ones. But kingship was not of God – it was a rejection of God! If we do not have our eyes open to the spirit of the empire and we do something that is birthed out of a desire for position we will end up coming under that spirit. My point in my initial paragraph is that God compromises functionally for redemptive purposes, and if we decide we need do this in a given situation we have to realise what we are doing is a compromise otherwise we will come under the spirit of compromise and lose our integrity today… or tomorrow.

Not great words of wisdom in the above but simply a few thoughts. We do nothing based on that what we do is better than someone else but that we have to live out of our convictions and then interact and work with others who have different convictions.


Post PermaLink

3 thoughts on “By all means compromise

  1. Thank you for exploring this topic. It is amazing that God compromises with us and will often give us what we want even if it wasn’t his Plan A for our lives or the world. That is why I guess we have to be careful what we pray for in case we get something which is not of his kingdom he is so kind and willing to work with us. Thank goodness he works redemptively through our mistaken convictions.
    But wondering just how far should we compromise with our convictions for our take on the ‘greater good’. For instance in the USA a certain person was appointed to the supreme court despite some pretty serious allegations and given massive support by the evangelical wing of the church. If they believed he was innocent then I suppose it was understandable but I actually saw somebody say on social media that even if he was guilty then his appointment served their agenda so was worth the compromise of other issues of character and morality. I personally feel that in general ‘the end justifies the means’ is a pretty unpalatable philosophy.
    So I understand any answer to this would be tricky but just how far do we go before compromise for the kingdom comes under the spirit of compromise?

  2. This whole blog paints a rather pathetic picture of God. Period. You have painted Him- the Sovreign King- to be utterly wishy washy. You have interpreted Him as one who lives off the seat of His pants, reacting to our random choices . Are you kidding me?
    This blog. Your thoughts are so off the true Biblical mark. NOT for me.

    1. Thanks Christine. I value your perspective on this. It is always difficult to write about God. As Barth said we can never say – and apologies for the masculine language – ‘by saying man with a loud voice we have said God’. He is not a projection of us, and I hope I am not guilty of that, as you suggest.

      Not to defend myself – or maybe to defend myself (!) the post seeks to point out that God has always walked with us, not because he is wishy washy. He is perfect and has never compromised his personhood / morality. But to walk with us, and the example of the anointing a king is one example of many, indicates that he comes to where we are. We cannot reach him – hence the Incarnation… he becomes as we are so we might be endued with the divine nature. In that sense, and only in that sense, is he a compromiser. We likewise have to learn how to compromise – we cannot make the perfect response but can make the redemptive choice, enabling a shift from one degree of glory to another.

      Again value your comment that you made, so a big thanks for taking the time to read something that you do not agree with. That was generous of you.

Comments are closed.

Post section built on the WordPress platform. | Theme: Perspectives 18, a fully-responsive, mobile-first design developed by © Martin Scott. | Site contents © Perspectives, 2007 - 2021, all rights reserved. | If interested in a customised site email: Martin Scott.
Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!