Big (good or bad?) words

Here then are the words: leadership, accountability, submission, discipleship… and I am sure a host of other words that I don’t know or don’t know how to spell!

Words to have meaning but their effective meaning is more tied to how they are understood rather than ‘this word means…’

I remember talking to someone who was strongly in relationship with people he had been journeying with for decades but was not attending a regular gathering (to which had been ascribed the word ‘church’). He met one who was to be found ‘in the right place on a Sunday’ who was somewhat put out by his lack of attendance is such a setting. The conversation went,

Where do you worship?

With the response ‘Normally when I get out bed I turn my heart to the Lord, when I wash my face in the morning I am always thankful and praising God, then I take time to worship the Lord as I thank God for family, friends and the food on the table.Ilike to start the day in worship.’

Out of interest where do you worship?

That question was conveniently not responded to as the hard hitting, deeply penetrating question was next:

Who are you accountable to?

Such a penetrating question and the answer went as follows:

A great question, I guess I could answer that a number of ways, but as you are asking it, let me suggest I also become accountable to you, and maybe we could do something that is mutual. Here is the phone number of my wife why to give her a call and ask her to be honest about her observations and experience of me; I can easily give you access to my bank account and I would love to hear what you think about how I am stewarding what we have. How would that sound to you?

Surprise, surprise… that conversation ended there.

The questions were not the questions. The two questions were to find out if this person ticked the two boxes with the right answers. But the answers would not have answered the questions. I often think about Paul (did he write those ‘pastoral’ letters) and his check list for leadership. They essentially came down to two categories: go check out their home and find out from neighbours what they think. (Oh and something on having some ability to teach and not being a novice in the faith.) Wow… practical.

A few comments on those words above. If we think institutionally we might answer them one way but if we think relationally we will go down a different route.

Leadership is not title-oriented (Paul is not ‘Apostle Paul’) nor is it hierarchical. Tom Marshall said that when truth flows one way and honour and respect we have a problem. Jesus pointed out the leadership among the ‘gentiles’ with the statement that was not to be that way ‘among you’. And I think we have to extend this to affect our understanding of God. How does God ‘rule’? Top down? I understand what people mean by ‘God is in control’ but it often means that God is not taking any nonsense and controls, then we have a little internal conflict (did I write ‘little’?) because too much seems out of control! The mess is not down to God… and here comes another word (extra bonus I did not put it in the initial list) – delegate!

The way God works is to distribute not simply delegate. Leadership often delegates and at times there is the need to delegate, but God loves to divest. On the day of Pentecost there is not a delegated outpouring. First on Peter (that would help if we wanted to really think he was personally the ‘rock’) then Peter could bestow the Spirit to James and John… then we draw in the 12 and so on to the 120. God comes equally to all at the same time.

The work of God is hindered as ‘there is no king in the land and everyone does what is right in their own eyes’ and it is hindered as ‘there is a king in the land and no one can do what is right in their own eyes’ (second quote is not in the Bible!). The book of Judges has a ‘king is right’ lens and is very critical of the situation, and maybe a ‘king’ would have temporarily helped but it eventually led to Egypt coming back into Israel. We need an eye-test as not everything goes and we need corrective lenses (a Jesus-lens for life, Scripture, and particularly so as we no longer see people according to conventional categorisation). But with those lenses on – and getting them checked out regularly – we discover that there is to be no ‘king’ in the land and that we are to do what is right in our own eyes. Not stubbornly, nor independently but inter-relationally. So to one of the other words:

Submit… and always in the ‘middle voice’ and expressed relationally. Submit yourself to one another. Not I am at the top and I will subject you!

‘Where do I worship? And who am I accountable to?’ remain two really good questions. Imagine if we made the questions relational and not institutional. Maybe we could move toward ‘there was no king among them; there was a flow of life and openness; approval and push back was visible, and each person seemed to have sight on what they should do’. Maybe ‘the kingdom’ could just be ‘at hand’ if such was the case.

In the image of…?

The world of technology never stops and how do we respond? AI – another step in removing the human relational level, and yet it will be presented in a positive light so that we will build a relationship with it. And very soon (probably already) robots will offer whatever connection one wants. This is our world… a challenge to theology which is why a theology of humanity is so key.

In the meantime a little humour. We read ‘in the beginning God created… humanity.’ In the image of the divine. And the sobering side is I wonder in the following clip should we simply write and ‘in the beginning humanity created… robots in their own image’??? The challenge remains – a humanity truly in the image of God.

I do not know if the above was AI generated or not but it remains a provocative likelihood.

Empire or Love

Regular visitors here will know that occasionally I publish what someone else has written. Simon Swift has sent me a few articles of the past months and he has just sent me this. Simon writes clearly with a wonderful humility that invites thought. See what you think of this one particularly in the context of the rising Christian Nationalism.


The world is full of trouble, wars, and political upheaval fill the news streams. Economic collapse is threatened, and the cost of living is getting worse. Exceptional weather here in Europe with threats of extended and record breaking heatwaves, wild fires and draughts brings fear of ecological disaster. Freedoms under threat in countries that once championed liberal democracy. One could be forgiven for thinking this is all heading towards the Apocalypse. In the so called West, certain politicians have been using fear and hate to stir up nationalism as a vehicle to power and empire. A new brand of Christianity has been born just for the West: Christian Nationalism. Where does the Way of Jesus figure in all this? Is Jesus the answer?

The short answer, of course, is yes. But I have never liked short answers and just saying Jesus is the answer, is not good enough. Perhaps the question is wrong, too vague for a real answer, and why the question in the first place? Maybe you are happy that there are leaders willing to use what ever means to protect a national identity as part of the Faith. That democracy has failed us and we need a hero who can sort it all out, a populist politician giving easy slogans as answers.

Does Jesus’ story, message, and resurrection fit within this new brand of Christianity?

The use of the word Kingdom is found all over the bible and Jesus himself used it. Yet I find it a difficult term to use as it can lead to empire building instead of freedom. Perhaps it is used a lot, because as the Jewish scriptures were edited and developed, those involved lived in the kingdom of Israel. Again it seems that the people wanted a charismatic leader to provide all the answers for them. A search was begun to look for a leader with anointing to lead his people in the right direction, one dedicated to the kingdom of Israel, or should that be kingdom of Heaven? God was soon disappointed with their first king and he was replaced by their most famous one, David. Yet he too became corrupted by power. Humanity then had to wait a long time till God’s Word became flesh to be worthy of the title of king.

The title of Christ, or Messiah given to Jesus means the Anointed One. To me, this speaks more of Priesthood than kingship, of Aaron than of David. Of course we can see it as bringing the two together. It reminds us of the character Melchizedek; Jesus as priest/king. If a king he must have a kingdom. But what of that kingdom, what is it, and what does it mean to live in it?

One of Jesus’ own descriptions of his kingdom is of a small seed becoming a large tree and the birds coming to perch on its branches. Though I like to think of them as nesting in the tree making it their home. For me, this speaks of possibilities, of emergence and nurture rather than dominion and authority. The Word, an idea that is spoken in to reality. Or in this case planted into its hearers hearts and minds. Will it germinate? What will emerge from this planting? Another parable of Jesus comes to mind: the sower spreading the seed over different types of terrain. The parable gives us an understanding of how the environment is so important to the seeds growth. If the seed does begin its transformation into a tree, it emerges into an environment, it does not do so in isolation. Its shape will be effected by outside influences. A question we can ask is does it dominate the land it grows in or does it become a source of life for all that grows up around it? When the birds come to nest in it, do they find a home or prison, partnership, or master?

Jesus’ ministry was one of love and invitation, not command and judgement. The Anointed One as priest rather than king? The parable of the prodigal son is a good picture of what Jesus’ ministry was doing. Its effect on the establishment as well as to the lost children. The context is family, not institution or even religion. God is father, the lost come home to be sons & daughters. The older brother, upset at the father’s grace, complains and the father’s answer is quite remarkable. He tells the brother that everything is his. This speaks of inheritance. When we become followers of Jesus, do we become his father’s servants or his children?

If we choose to follow Jesus, we become his students. We are expected to become imitators of him: The Way of Jesus. This means the Way of love, it includes giving, mercy, resurrection, and humbleness and I’m sure you could add more this list. The Way starts with forgiveness and repentance. It is to chose to live a new kind of life; a change in direction and relationships. A movement away from the world’s empires and their expectations of conformity. A move towards eternal life.

The trouble with Kingdoms and their empires is they have an us-and-them view of the world. Empire requires ownership, all are resources to be used and discarded as necessary. You are either useful or not, loyal or the enemy. And if not useful, you are expelled; a type of death. If not loyal then death is the final solution. That’s what empires do. They are a hungry beast that exploit and devour the resources they have.

So I find the idea of Christian Nationalism worrying as it is more interested in gaining dominance in culture and social life that excludes those that do not conform; a type of empire. Exclusion (a type of death) being its main weapon, it can so easily turn into racism and incorporate ethnonationalism; ideas that go against the Way. After all our allegiance is to the Christ and his Way not to some western pattern of life and culture.

When we talk of the new age, the new heaven and earth becoming one. Is it a dramatic day of judgement where heaven and the old earth is literally destroyed and replaced by a new one? Or has the new age already begun and we who claim to follow Jesus are the planters of the seed with the intention of transformation to the Divine Commonwealth (or Kingdom of Heaven if you prefer)? Jesus does talk of judgement at the end, but he speaks of angels removing the weeds from the crop. But it is angels not us humans. Perhaps we should concentrate on being not the king’s judges, but priests. Ministers inviting people into the Divine Commonwealth. Practitioners of hope instead of judgment and fear. The way we walk, talk, and do our daily lives is our tilling of the soil. Preparing it for planting so when the Word comes and plants the seed: a mighty tree grows and birds come to rest.

Dispensationalism – history and critique

Here is a final pdf… pretty much what the former posts contained but with footnoting.

Dispensationalism_history_and_critique.pdf

Click on the link above to read / download. I often offer an ‘open Zoom’ to discuss the contents of each pdf I write (this is the 9th volume) but am not convinced that the contents deserve that. If you think otherwise let me know.


If interested this the 9th volume and I intended them to be a follow on from the four initial books I wrote in 2020. CHeck out the others:

Vol 1: Paul’s Gospel in Galatians (pdf).

Vol 2: Understanding Transitions (pdf).

Vol 3: A historico-narrative approach to Scripture (pdf).

Vol 4: Eschatology: an introduction (pdf).

Vol 5: Eschatology: The Second Horizon (pdf).

Vol 6: Eschatology: Here not There (pdf).

Vol 7: Reconciliation in four directions (pdf).

Vol 8: All Israel will be saved (pdf).

Vol. 9: DIspensationalism – history and critique (pdf).

Perspectives